ArticleBMJ public health2025
Parental experiences and support needs following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: a qualitative study across the continuum of care in Turkey.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) are the most common fetal anomalies, presenting parents with a difficult decision regarding whether to continue or terminate the pregnancy. This study explores the perspectives of parents who chose to continue their pregnancies after a CHD diagnosis, aiming to understand their decision-making processes and the subsequent experiences. Methods: Between January and November 2024, 30 families with children diagnosed with CHD were interviewed. Thematic analysis was performed on the interviews, categorised into four stages: Prenatal Screening to Confirmative Diagnosis, Continuation of Pregnancy to Birth, Birth to Postnatal Period and Raising a Child with CHD. Parent-child bonding and marital quality were evaluated using psychiatric assessment questionnaires. Results: Thematic analysis revealed that prenatal diagnosis often triggered emotional distress, with decisions influenced by factors like physician input, religious beliefs and emotional bonding with the fetus. During birth and treatment, unexpected complications, particularly ICU-related challenges, affected parent-child bonding and emotional well-being. In childhood, ongoing medical needs led to developmental concerns and heightened parental vigilance. Throughout all stages, communication quality with healthcare providers and system-level gaps, such as poor referral structures, shaped family experiences. CHD also impacted family dynamics, reproductive decisions and was compounded by societal stigma and a lack of awareness. Conclusion: CHD requires lifelong care from healthcare professionals and parents. The study highlights the need for improvements in care, emphasising a holistic approach that addresses both parental and child needs. Key recommendations include developing structured referral systems, promoting shared decision-making, integrating parent counselling and establishing support mechanisms to reduce parental stress. Focusing on these areas could improve patient outcomes and family care experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.