ReviewTranslational pediatrics2025
Pediatric benign esophageal strictures: current understanding from etiology to treatment.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal strictures (ES) are a significant clinical concern in pediatric esophageal diseases and substantially affect patients' quality of life. The causes can be classified as congenital, secondary, and dyskinetic types. While most ES cases are benign, clinical outcomes vary widely by etiology, necessitating personalized therapeutic strategies. Current approaches predominantly involve minimally invasive endoscopic interventions, including balloon or bougie dilation, stent placement, incisional therapy, and intralesional steroid injection. Refractory cases may require combining or alternating multimodal therapies or surgical intervention, warranting further attention from clinicians. Despite varying causes of ES, conservative management is generally preferred over surgery in children. Endoscopic dilation, using bougie or balloons, is the most frequently employed technique, with comparable safety and efficacy. For recurrent or refractory ES, commonly arising from caustic ingestion, surgical anastomosis, congenital malformations, or radiation-induced strictures, adjunctive options include intralesional drug injection, stent placement, and endoscopic incisional therapy. They remain a challenge for many endoscopists. This review summarizes advances in pediatric ES management. While endoscopic treatment in complex and refractory strictures remains challenging, comparison across relevant studies is limited by inconsistent definitions of endoscopic or clinical success metrics. Novel methods have been developed to optimize treatment for refractory strictures. However, further studies in pediatric populations are necessary to validate their efficacy as adjuncts to endoscopic dilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.