Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367502›Full record

ReviewInnovation in aging2025

Socially focused intelligent assistive technologies for caregiving for homebound older adults with cognitive impairment: a scoping review.

Juliet Chigozie Donatus Ezulike, Mohit Prashar, Kosisochukwu Anyaegbunam, Blessing Ugochi Ojembe, Shital Desai, Michael Ebe Kalu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juliet Chigozie Donatus EzulikeSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-5679
Mohit PrasharSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5340-3657
Kosisochukwu AnyaegbunamSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Blessing Ugochi OjembeFaculty of Social Work, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-9697
Shital DesaiSchool of Arts, Media, Performance, and Design, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1851-0597
Michael Ebe KaluSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2070-2213

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Being homebound with cognitive impairment (CI) presents major public health challenges, increasing home healthcare costs and contributing to caregiver burden, social isolation, and reduced quality of life. As loneliness and social isolation rise among this population, socially focused intelligent assistive technologies (SFIATs) have emerged as increasingly viable solutions. This scoping review examined the current body of literature on SFIATs and the barriers and facilitators to their support of homebound older adults with CI and their caregivers. Research Design and Methods: Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, we searched 12 databases with MeSH terms related to older adults, CI, SFIATs, and homebound status. Data were analyzed descriptively using themes, with findings mapped across the socioecological framework. Results: Nineteen studies conducted in 12 high-income countries were included. Robots, tablets, telephones, computers, virtual avenues, and other smart devices were among the SFIATs utilized in caregiving for older individuals who were homebound or had CI. SFIATs facilitated social interaction, engagement, and connectedness among older adults and caregivers. Challenges and benefits associated with their use were evident at individual, interpersonal, community, organizational, and policy levels. Discussion and Implications: Research suggests significant potential in SFIATs, but their implementation faces multi-level challenges, often due to limited direct input from end-users, leading to concerns that impact their utilization. SFIAT development must adopt co-creation approaches to ensure its contextual appropriateness. Further research is needed, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, to understand the landscape, benefits, and challenges of SFIATs in diverse global settings.

Indexed as

Caregiving technologiesCognitive statusHome-based careHomebound status

Identifiers

PMID41367502
PMCPMC12685371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.