ReviewInnovation in aging2025
Socially focused intelligent assistive technologies for caregiving for homebound older adults with cognitive impairment: a scoping review.
Review in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Being homebound with cognitive impairment (CI) presents major public health challenges, increasing home healthcare costs and contributing to caregiver burden, social isolation, and reduced quality of life. As loneliness and social isolation rise among this population, socially focused intelligent assistive technologies (SFIATs) have emerged as increasingly viable solutions. This scoping review examined the current body of literature on SFIATs and the barriers and facilitators to their support of homebound older adults with CI and their caregivers. Research Design and Methods: Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, we searched 12 databases with MeSH terms related to older adults, CI, SFIATs, and homebound status. Data were analyzed descriptively using themes, with findings mapped across the socioecological framework. Results: Nineteen studies conducted in 12 high-income countries were included. Robots, tablets, telephones, computers, virtual avenues, and other smart devices were among the SFIATs utilized in caregiving for older individuals who were homebound or had CI. SFIATs facilitated social interaction, engagement, and connectedness among older adults and caregivers. Challenges and benefits associated with their use were evident at individual, interpersonal, community, organizational, and policy levels. Discussion and Implications: Research suggests significant potential in SFIATs, but their implementation faces multi-level challenges, often due to limited direct input from end-users, leading to concerns that impact their utilization. SFIAT development must adopt co-creation approaches to ensure its contextual appropriateness. Further research is needed, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, to understand the landscape, benefits, and challenges of SFIATs in diverse global settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.