Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367485›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Electron Microscopy in Renal Biopsy Interpretation: When and Why It Still Matters.

Hussein Qasim, Zeina Hayajneh, Karis Khattab, Matteo Luigi Giuseppe Leoni, Giustino Varrassi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hussein QasimDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JOR.
Zeina HayajnehDepartment of Public Health, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JOR.
Karis KhattabFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, JOR.
Matteo Luigi Giuseppe LeoniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ITA.
Giustino VarrassiDepartment of Pain Medicine, Fondazione Paolo Procacci, Rome, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron microscopy (EM) remains an indispensable tool in renal pathology, providing ultrastructural details that complement light microscopy (LM) and immunofluorescence (IF) in the diagnosis of glomerular diseases. This review outlines the diagnostic role of EM across major categories of glomerular pathology, emphasizing its value in confirming and refining histopathological diagnoses. In membranous nephropathy, EM visualizes subepithelial electron-dense deposits and tracks disease progression through glomerular basement membrane (GBM) remodeling. In immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritides, such as IgA nephropathy and lupus nephritis, EM localizes deposits to mesangial, subendothelial, or subepithelial regions, facilitating accurate classification. For C3 glomerulopathies, EM distinguishes dense deposit disease from C3 glomerulonephritis by revealing unique ribbon-like intramembranous densities. In hereditary nephritides like Alport syndrome and thin basement membrane nephropathy, EM provides pathognomonic findings of GBM lamellation and thinning that often precede or guide genetic testing. Additionally, EM identifies organized deposits in fibrillary and immunotactoid glomerulopathies and helps differentiate diabetic glomerulosclerosis from mimickers through assessment of GBM thickening and matrix expansion. Despite advances in molecular diagnostics, EM remains essential for identifying subtle ultrastructural changes, validating immunopathologic interpretations, and guiding clinical management. This article reinforces EM's continued relevance in an era of expanding genetic and serologic tools.

Indexed as

c3 glomerulopathyelectron microscopyfocal segmental glomerulosclerosisglomerular diseasesmembranous nephropathyrenal biopsyultrastructural pathology

Identifiers

PMID41367485
PMCPMC12683193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.