ArticleCureus2025
General Ondansetron Exposure and ICU Outcomes: A Comprehensive Analysis of 85,229 Critically Ill Adults Using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV).
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with severe sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia: a target trial emulation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Nausea and vomiting are frequent in critically ill patients and complicate airway safety, medication delivery, and nutrition. Ondansetron is widely used for symptom control, yet its effect on survival in the intensive care unit (ICU) is unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Adult ICU admissions from 2008-2019 were stratified by receipt of ondansetron. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS) and a pragmatic readmission proxy. Analyses included Welch's t-tests, chi-square tests, multivariable logistic regression, prespecified subgroup analyses, and 1:1 propensity score-matching. Results Among 85,229 ICU admissions, 40,205 received ondansetron and 45,024 did not. Mortality was lower with ondansetron than without (9.1% vs 12.9%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, ondansetron was associated with lower odds of death (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.69-0.75). In a 1:1 propensity-matched cohort of 31,221 patients per group, mortality remained lower with ondansetron (11.3% vs 14.6%; OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.71-0.78). Ondansetron did not shorten ICU LOS. Conclusions Ondansetron exposure during ICU admission was independently associated with reduced in-hospital mortality. These findings suggest a potential survival benefit of a commonly used, well-tolerated antiemetic and support further prospective evaluation of ondansetron as an adjunctive therapy in critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.