Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367408›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in dental medicine2025

The efficiency of periodontal endoscopy in non-surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shahad B Alsharif, Nour Hobani

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shahad B AlsharifDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Nour HobaniDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Periodontal endoscopy offers a minimally invasive method to enhance subgingival visualization, potentially improving the outcomes of periodontal therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the current evidence in the adjunctive use of periodontal endoscopy. Methods: The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews "PROSPERO", managed by the Center for Reviews and Dissemination, the National Institute for Health Research, University of York, UK, under registration identification number (CRD420251051901). PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases were searched up to June 2025 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in English investigating non-surgical periodontal therapy with and without the adjunctive use of periodontal endoscopy. The authors independently with consensus extracted clinical outcomes. The RoB2, the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs, was utilized to evaluate risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed for quantitative assessment. Results: Nine RCTs were identified. The narrative results of the reported clinical outcomes were diverse. Meta-analysis revealed that periodontal endoscopy was associated with significantly less residual calculus (mean difference: -1.87%, Conclusion: The adjunctive use of periodontal endoscopy outperformed the conventional scaling and root planing alone in calculus removal but appears to be more time-consuming. Yet, more homogeneous RCTs are necessary to attain clear evidence on additional clinical outcomes. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251051901, Identifier CRD420251051901.

Indexed as

endoscopymeta-analysisperiodontal diseaseperiodontitisscaling and root planingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41367408
PMCPMC12682854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.