Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367402›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025

The use of internet for health information by hospitalised patients in Switzerland and Qatar: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Ameena Jesaimani, Jassim Fakhro, Youssef Daali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ameena JesaimaniDepartment of Pharmacy, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Jassim FakhroSurgery Department, Metabolic, bariatric, and robotic surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Youssef DaaliDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Geneva University, Geneva, Swtizerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The internet has become a critical resource for accessing health information worldwide. Online health information seeking (OHIS) is increasingly common among hospitalised patients, particularly those with chronic conditions. While prior studies have explored OHIS in individual countries, limited evidence exists comparing behaviours across different sociocultural and healthcare contexts. This study compared patterns of internet use for health information among hospitalised patients in Switzerland and Qatar. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted between January and June 2016 in two tertiary hospitals in Switzerland, and Qatar. Eligible patients (18-80 years) admitted to internal medicine, visceral surgery, or orthopaedics wards completed a 33-item structured questionnaire, available in French and Arabic, covering sociodemographic characteristics, internet access, health information-seeking behaviour, and use during hospitalisation. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to identify predictors of OHIS. Results: A total of 820 patients participated (617 Swiss, 203 Qatari). Swiss patients were older (mean age 57 ± 15) than Qataris (44 ± 16, Conclusion: This study highlights significant cross-country differences in OHIS behaviour among hospitalised patients, shaped by sociodemographic, cultural, and healthcare system contexts. Findings underscore the need for culturally relevant, trustworthy, and patient-centred digital health resources to enhance patient empowerment, improve clinician-patient communication, and reduce risks of misinformation.

Indexed as

health informationhospitalized patientsInternetQatarquestionnaire surveySwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID41367402
PMCPMC12683762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.