ArticleJournal of neuropsychology2026
Category fluency and creative potential in semantic aphasia.
Article in Journal of neuropsychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Category fluency and creative potential in semantic aphasia.Journal of neuropsychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Creative cognition involves linking weakly or unrelated concepts, enabled by semantic control (inhibiting dominant associations to retrieve weaker ones) or through spreading activation within the semantic system. Semantic aphasia (SA) patients have impaired semantic control despite relatively preserved semantic representations. To date, no studies have examined creativity in SA. It remains unclear how impaired control affects patients' creative potential, and whether spreading activation alone supports this. Creative potential was assessed across three experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 involved 11 SA patients and 25 controls; Experiment 3 included 13 SA patients and 14 controls. In Experiment 1 (category judgement), participants selected five targets from distractors across 24 categories with differing coherence levels (shared features among members). Experiment 2 (constrained category fluency) involved generating five exemplars per category. Creative potential was measured via uniqueness, flexibility, semantic distance and creativity ratings. Experiment 3 (unconstrained fluency) asked participants to name as many Animals as possible in 1 minute, with additional measures of clustering and switching. Although SA cases were unable to shape retrieval to pre-defined associations (in the category judgement task), they showed creative potential in the constrained fluency task. In the unconstrained fluency task, patients were less able to use strategies. However, with fluency controlled, no group differences in creative potential existed. These findings provide the first neuropsychological evidence that spreading activation, even with impaired semantic control, can support creative responses. Creative potential in SA depends on task demands, aligning with broader findings of patients' sensitivity to context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.