SynthesisJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Effectiveness and Safety of Intralesional Dutasteride in Patients With Androgenic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness and Safety of Intralesional Dutasteride in Patients With Androgenic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAndrogenic alopecia (AGA) is a common condition characterized by progressive hair loss influenced by dihydrotestosterone (DHT). While oral dutasteride has shown efficacy in treating AGA, concerns about systemic side effects have prompted interest in localized treatments such as intralesional administration.
aimsThis systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of intralesional dutasteride for treating AGA in adults.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases for studies involving adults (≥ 18 years) with AGA treated with intralesional dutasteride. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, non-randomized studies, cohort studies, and observational studies. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, duplicate publications, and studies lacking relevant outcome data. The primary outcomes were improvements in hair density, hair thickness, and photographic evidence of hair growth. Secondary outcomes assessed safety, including local and systemic adverse events. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers.
resultsIncluded studies consistently reported improvements in hair density and thickness following intralesional dutasteride treatment, with photographic evidence supporting visual improvement. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with minimal adverse events such as mild scalp irritation and no significant systemic effects reported. However, the studies varied in methodology, sample size, and follow-up duration.
conclusionsIntralesional dutasteride appears to be a promising treatment option for AGA, offering localized efficacy with a favorable safety profile. Nonetheless, the current evidence is limited by heterogeneity and a lack of large-scale, high-quality trials. Further standardized research is needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.