Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41367200›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical periodontology2026

Interdental Brushing and Obstetrical Outcomes in Nulliparous Pregnant Women: Insights From a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.

Denis Bourgeois, Aida Kanoute, Daouda Faye, Marta Mazur, Hervé Perrier, Roman Ardan, Céline Clément, Lucio Souza Gonçalves, Romain Lan, Florence Carrouel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Denis BourgeoisLaboratory Health Systemic Process (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-2512
Aida KanoutePublic, Health Service, Department of Dentistry, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal.ORCID 0009-0007-9425-3568
Daouda FayePublic, Health Service, Department of Dentistry, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal.
Marta MazurDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0525-681X
Hervé PerrierClinical Research Unit, Protestant Infirmary, Lyon, France.
Roman ArdanDepartment of Economic Sciences, Koszalin University of Technology, Koszalin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-4863
Céline ClémentLaboratory Health Systemic Process (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-0208
Lucio Souza GonçalvesOral and Systemic Infections Laboratory, Estacio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-6310
Romain LanLaboratory Health Systemic Process (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5612-880X
Florence CarrouelLaboratory Health Systemic Process (P2S), UR4129, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6823-1636

Funding

Curaden AG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPregnancy gingivitis is potentially modifiable, making it a promising target for preventive strategies to reduce adverse obstetrical outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether an interdental hygiene intervention in early pregnancy could reduce obstetrical complications. Exploratory analyses focused on potential biological pathways linking oral inflammation and obstetrical outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsA two-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) with cluster allocation (1:1) was conducted in six antenatal clinics in Senegal among nulliparous women at 12 weeks. Participants received either a daily calibrated interdental brushing intervention (Intervention) or usual oral hygiene (Control). Follow-up visits were scheduled at 5 and 8 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age or pre-eclampsia, analysed exploratorily under the intention-to-treat principle.

resultsA total of 323 women were randomised (162 intervention, 161 control). The composite outcome occurred in 28.4% of the intervention group and 24.2% of the control group (p = 0.449). After adjustment, the intervention was not significantly associated (aOR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.39-1.10; p = 0.107). Exploratory analyses suggested that interdental bleeding and C-reactive protein (CRP) could act as mediators, accounting for ~60% of the effect, with the remaining ~40% representing a direct effect. No intervention-related adverse events were observed.

conclusionThis RCT did not demonstrate a significant reduction in obstetrical complications with early interdental prophylaxis. However, the intervention was safe, acceptable and feasible within antenatal care, highlighting the need for adequately powered trials to clarify its potential clinical impact.

Indexed as

GingivitisOral HygienePregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeToothbrushingAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeParityPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPremature Birthgingival bleedinggingivitisinflammationinterdental hygienelow birth weightobstetrical outcomesperiodontal healthpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41367200
PMCPMC12890452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.