Trial reportJournal of clinical periodontology2026
Interdental Brushing and Obstetrical Outcomes in Nulliparous Pregnant Women: Insights From a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Interdental Brushing on Pregnancy-Associated Gingivitis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Trial
- Interdental Brushing and Obstetrical Outcomes in Nulliparous Pregnant Women: Insights From a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Trial
- The Maternal Microbiome in Pregnancy: From Physiological Changes to Dysbiosis and Obstetrical Complications-Therapeutic Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The oral microbiome in relation to systemic maternal conditions and pregnancy complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
- Planetary health diet with einkorn as a potential preventive strategy to improve interdental microbiota, oral health and quality of life: a pilot clinical trial.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Oral prophylaxis for the reduction of interdental dysbiosis-associated red complex pathogens during pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimPregnancy gingivitis is potentially modifiable, making it a promising target for preventive strategies to reduce adverse obstetrical outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether an interdental hygiene intervention in early pregnancy could reduce obstetrical complications. Exploratory analyses focused on potential biological pathways linking oral inflammation and obstetrical outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsA two-arm randomised controlled trial (RCT) with cluster allocation (1:1) was conducted in six antenatal clinics in Senegal among nulliparous women at 12 weeks. Participants received either a daily calibrated interdental brushing intervention (Intervention) or usual oral hygiene (Control). Follow-up visits were scheduled at 5 and 8 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age or pre-eclampsia, analysed exploratorily under the intention-to-treat principle.
resultsA total of 323 women were randomised (162 intervention, 161 control). The composite outcome occurred in 28.4% of the intervention group and 24.2% of the control group (p = 0.449). After adjustment, the intervention was not significantly associated (aOR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.39-1.10; p = 0.107). Exploratory analyses suggested that interdental bleeding and C-reactive protein (CRP) could act as mediators, accounting for ~60% of the effect, with the remaining ~40% representing a direct effect. No intervention-related adverse events were observed.
conclusionThis RCT did not demonstrate a significant reduction in obstetrical complications with early interdental prophylaxis. However, the intervention was safe, acceptable and feasible within antenatal care, highlighting the need for adequately powered trials to clarify its potential clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.