ArticleMedicine2025
Analysis of infection-related adverse events induced by proton pump inhibitors based on the FAERS and JADER databases.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to analyze infection-related adverse events related to different proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and explore the characteristics of Infection-related adverse events and the intensity of drug association based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database and Japan Adverse Drug Event Report Database (JADER), so as to promote the rational application of PPIs.
methodsThe adverse event reports of omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, esomeprazole, dexlansoprazole and vonoprazan in 78 quarters from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 were searched and extracted by FAERS and JADER, and the adverse events were systematically classified by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities term set. Then, data processing and analysis of the 7 drug-related reports were carried out by reporting odds ratio method.
resultsInclusion of infection-related adverse event report statistics: in the FAERS database, 2 806 reports of omeprazole, 1 652 reports of lansoprazole, 2 922 reports of pantoprazole, 265 reports of rabeprazole, 6 004 reports of esomeprazole, and 297 reports of dexlansoprazole; and in the JADER database, 79 reports of omeprazole, 137 reports of esomeprazole, 414 reports of lansoprazole, 117 reports of rabeprazole, and 204 reports of vonoprazan; 3 185 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) signals were obtained in the FAERS database with signals involving 27 system organ class, whereas 478 ADRs signals were obtained in the JADER database with ADRs signals involving 25 system organ class, and infectious pneumonias were the most common in both databases.
conclusionsIn the use of PPIs, we should pay attention to the occurrence of related adverse reactions, especially the damage to the infection-related adverse effects, monitor the relevant indicators, and take timely intervention measures to ensure the safety of medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.