Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366988›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Exploration between caffeine intake, physical activity, and prostate cancer using data from the large-scale NHANES survey: A cross-sectional study.

Qiaomei Liu, Siying Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qiaomei LiuDepartment of Urology, Wuhan Fourth Hospital, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the association between caffeine intake, physical activity (PA), and prostate cancer, machine learning algorithms to build predictive models of prostate cancer. A total of 1789 subjects from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009 to 2018 waves were enrolled in this study. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was applied to evaluate the association. Then, we conducted 4 machine learning models, including extreme gradient boosting, AdaBoost, Catboos, and Boost tree to predict the occurrence of prostate cancer. In the fully adjusted model, compared to those reporting little caffeine consumption, those who reported large intake had a multivariate adjusted odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.25 (2.21-15.52). Participants with large PA were more likely to develop prostate cancer (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47-3.80), whereas a significant inverse association between medium PA and prostate cancer was observed (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.81). Extreme gradient boosting, Catboost, and Boost tree all have good prediction effects, with an AUC of up to 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93). No significant association was observed between small to medium caffeine intake and prostate cancer, large caffeine intake and PA was associated with increased prostate cancer. Moderate PA has the potential to favorably influence prostate cancer.

Indexed as

CaffeineExerciseProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRisk FactorsUnited StatesCaffeinecaffeine intakemachine learningphysical activitypredictionprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID41366988
PMCPMC12688939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.