ArticleMedicine2025
Causality between rheumatic diseases and iron-deficiency anemia: A 2-sample, 2-step mediation Mendelian randomization investigation.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Causal risk and protective factors for rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive mendelian randomization systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that patients with rheumatic disease are associated with iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). However, the causal relationship between rheumatic disease and IDA risk remains unclear. To investigate this, we conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study using genetic variants from the large genome-wide association studies. In this study, we primarily investigated common rheumatic diseases, which include rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Sjogren syndrome (SS), systemic sclerosis (SSc) as exposures, with IDA as the outcome and iron status as the mediator. We extracted significant and independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms from the large European genome-wide association studies for each trait: RA (5427 cases and 479,171 controls), SLE (5201 cases and 9066 controls), SS (1290 cases and 213,145 controls) and SSc (302 cases and 213,145 controls). Outcomes comprised IDA (2941 cases and 481,657 controls) and 4 iron status biomarkers (serum iron, ferritin, transferrin, transferrin saturation; n = 48,972) to serve as instrumental variables. In the MR analysis, we primarily used the inverse-variance weighting method, supplemented by weighted-median and MR-Egger methods. Additionally, a series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the stability of the MR analysis. We identified 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms for RA, 41 for SLE, 3 for SS, and 7 for SSc as instrumental variables. Univariate bidirectional MR analysis suggests that RA increases IDA risk (OR = 1.058, 95% CI: 1.024-1.094, P <.01). However, we found no significant genetic effect for SLE, SS, or SSc. In 2-step MR analysis, multivariate MR (MVMR) indicates that RA and ferritin independently affect IDA risk (RA: OR = 1.073, 95% CI: 1.005-1.146, P = .03; ferritin: OR = 0.997, 95% CI: 0.995-0.999, P <.01). Additionally, the mediation MR analysis suggested that ferritin partially mediated this effect. Our findings initially provide strong genetic evidence for the association between RA and an increased risk of IDA, with ferritin partially mediating this effect. However, no such association was found between SLE, SS, SSc and IDA. These results could inform the development of preventive strategies and interventions for rheumatic diseases and IDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.