ArticleMedicine2025
Exploring the relationship between social determinants of health and erectile dysfunction using the NHANES survey.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a prevalent health issue that significantly impacts men's sexual health and may be related to social factors. This study aims to examine the association between social determinants of health (SDoH) and ED in American men. This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2004, including 1858 men aged ≥20 years. Each unfavorable SDoH was assigned a score of 1, including unemployment, low income, food insecurity, low education levels, lack of healthcare access, lack of health insurance, housing instability, and not being married or living with a partner. ED status was defined by self-reported erectile function. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the associations of SDoH scores with ED. Restricted cubic spline was used to identify the dose-response relationship. Cumulative SDoH scores were associated with ED status (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03-1.37). This relationship was nonlinear, with a cutoff value of 2 (Poverall < 0.001, Pnonlinear = 0.046). Unemployment (OR = 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.33), a family income-to-poverty ratio < 300% (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.19-2.16), and education level below high school (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.05-2.91) were independently associated with ED status. Individuals with unfavorable SDoH, particularly those who are unemployed, have low income, and low education levels, are at higher risk for ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.