Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366935›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Survey of attitudes and willingness of cardiovascular specialist nurses towards nurse practitioners in Sichuan, China: A cross-sectional study.

Huaili Luo, Zhi Zeng, Dan Wen, Li Jiang, Hong Jiang, Xiaochun He, Xin Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huaili LuoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mianyang Central Hospital, Affiliated with the School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Zhi Zeng
Dan Wen
Li Jiang
Hong Jiang
Xiaochun He

Funding

The study was supported by the Health Humanities Research Center of Zigong Federation of Social Sciences (JKRWZC22-01). (JKRWZC22-01)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the attitudes and willingness of cardiovascular specialist nurses in Sichuan, China toward nurse practitioners (NPs), analyzed the influencing factors, and provided references for further research on cardiovascular NPs. Convenience sampling was used to select 371 cardiovascular specialist nurses from 51 hospitals in Sichuan Province, China. The participants completed an online survey using a questionnaire developed for this study that assessed their attitudes and willingness toward NPs. The results indicate that cardiovascular specialist nurses hold varying attitudes toward NPs. Multiple linear regression analysis reveals that professional title and monthly income level are significant factors influencing attitude scores (P < .05). The primary concerns regarding the development of cardiovascular NPs include low patient understanding and acceptance, insufficient professional competence, inadequate educational preparation, and a lack of support from relevant policies and regulations for practice. Cardiovascular specialist nurses hold mixed attitudes toward NPs and still have concerns about future development prospects and potential difficulties. To address these issues, it is necessary to provide training to nurses on the required knowledge, promptly introduce policies and regulations, and establish standardized access systems and training programs to provide strong guarantees for the development of NPs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCardiovascular NursingNurse PractitionersAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesattitudecardiovascular specialist nursenurse practitionerswillingness

Identifiers

PMID41366935
PMCPMC12688874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.