ArticleMedicine2025
Integrated multidisciplinary nursing with enhanced recovery protocols improves postoperative outcomes in glioma patients.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioma is a common and aggressive primary brain tumor associated with poor prognosis and complex postoperative recovery. Optimizing perioperative care through multidisciplinary integration and enhanced recovery protocols may improve outcomes for these patients. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an integrated healthcare model combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in improving postoperative recovery, reducing complications, and enhancing quality of life in glioma patients undergoing surgical resection. This retrospective cohort study included 272 glioma patients who underwent surgical treatment from 2020 to 2022. Patients were assigned to either a conventional care group (n = 152) or an integrated care group with ERAS (n = 120). Recovery indicators, complication rates, pain levels, psychological status, quality of life, functional outcomes (Karnofsky Performance Status scores), and nursing satisfaction were compared between the 2 groups. The integrated care with ERAS group demonstrated significantly faster recovery, including earlier mobilization, shorter hospital stays, and reduced time to first oral intake (all P < .05). The total complication rate was significantly lower (10.83% vs 19.74%, P = .041), with notable reductions in respiratory infections and deep vein thrombosis. Pain scores and duration were consistently lower in the ERAS group, especially beyond 8 hours postoperatively (P < .05). Quality of life, functional status at 3 and 6 months, and mental health scores improved significantly. Nursing satisfaction was also higher (95.00% vs. 82.24%, P = .001). The integration of multidisciplinary care with ERAS significantly improves postoperative recovery, reduces complications and pain, and enhances the overall quality of life and patient satisfaction in glioma patients. These findings support broader implementation of integrated ERAS-based care in neurosurgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.