Observational studyMedicine2025
Continuous care in hypertension management: Effects on blood pressure control, quality of life, and nursing satisfaction.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the impact of continuous care on blood pressure control, quality of life (QOL), and patient satisfaction among individuals with hypertension. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 120 patients diagnosed with hypertension who were treated at our hospital between June 2021 and June 2022. According to the nursing model documented in their charts, patients were classified into an experimental group (n = 60), who had received continuous care (CC), and a control group (n = 60), who had received routine nursing care. The observation period for both groups was 6 months. Clinical data, including blood pressure measurements, QOL scores, nursing satisfaction, and adverse reactions, were collected from follow-up records and patient questionnaires. All enrolled patients met WHO diagnostic criteria for hypertension. Compared with baseline, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure showed significant reductions at 3 and 6 months, though no obvious changes were observed after 1 month. QOL scores improved progressively at 1, 3, and 6 months (P < .05). The experimental group achieved superior improvements in daily living ability, cognitive function, and clinical indicators (P < .05). Nursing satisfaction was markedly higher in the experimental group, with differences becoming more pronounced over time (P < .05). While conventional care yielded certain benefits for hypertensive patients, continuous care produced greater overall advantages, including better blood pressure regulation, enhanced QOL, and higher patient satisfaction. Moreover, continuous care effectively alleviated negative emotions, particularly among patients with moderate to severe hypertension, thereby improving treatment adherence and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.