Observational studyMedicine2025
Analyzing adverse event signals of aprepitant using FAERS database data in real-world settings: Broadening the adverse event spectrum of aprepitant and its clinical implications.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist approved by the US FDA for chemotherapy- and postoperative-induced nausea and vomiting, has limited real-world safety data; we therefore interrogated the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023 to systematically characterize aprepitant-associated adverse drug events. After extracting 8271 reports on 3033 patients, we applied a combined signal detection framework - reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network with multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker - and analyzed demographics, reporter profiles and temporal trends. Women represented 54.10% of cases, the 45 to 65-year age group 27.86%, and healthcare professionals filed 65.64% of reports; the United States, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and China contributed most cases, peaking during 2013 to 2019. While labeled toxicities were confirmed, novel high-strength signals emerged, including joint deposition, oral mucosal roughening, encephalopathy, dysplasia, febrile myelodysplasia, small cell lung cancer and tonic-clonic movements, whereas dyspnea and nausea remained the 2 most frequently reported events. These findings corroborate known risks and unveil previously under-recognized aprepitant related adverse reactions, providing actionable safety guidance for clinicians and suggesting that the strong joint deposition signal warrants prospective investigation of aprepitant in arthritic disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.