Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366885›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2025

Spectrum of mental health among students: A scientometric analysis of 20 years of research on depression and anxiety.

Irum Zeb, Aashiq Khan, Yuhao Su

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irum ZebSchool of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-8774
Aashiq KhanSchool of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, P. R. China.
Yuhao SuCollege of Literature and Law, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health and well-being are vital for students' success. Over the past decade, concerns about student mental health have increased globally. However, research in this field remains fragmented. This study analyzes research conducted from 2004 to 2024. The Web of Science database was used to analyze 84,024 articles to map global research trends in student mental health, with a focus on depression and anxiety. Using VOSviewer, we identified key journals such as Depression and Anxiety (210 publications, 10,747 citations), BMC Psychiatry, and the Journal of Affective Disorders as dominant publication sources. Keyword analysis highlights depression, anxiety, and prevalence as central themes. Leading researchers include Penninx B.W.J.H. with 47 publications and Kessler R.C. with 5518 citations. The most-cited study is by Kessler et al. (2012), with 1927 citations. Geographically, the United States leads in research output with 960 documents and 46,546 citations, followed by the Netherlands (321 documents) and the United Kingdom (396 documents). China ranks seventh with 213 documents, while India does not appear among the top 10 contributors. The analysis reveals limitations, such as database bias due to reliance on Web of Science and citation imbalances. We propose expanding data sources, standardizing terminology, and integrating qualitative methods. These findings emphasize the need for equitable global collaboration and policy-driven interventions to address student mental health challenges effectively.

Indexed as

AnxietyBehavioral ResearchDepressionMental HealthStudentsBibliometricsGlobal HealthHumansdepression and anxiety bibliometric analysisstudent mental healthVOS viewer

Identifiers

PMID41366885
PMCPMC12688983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.