ArticleJournal of separation science2025
How to Process Samples for Metabolomics in Ecology: A Comparative Study of Preanalytical Storage Methods.
Article in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How to Process Samples for Metabolomics in Ecology: A Comparative Study of Preanalytical Storage Methods.Journal of separation science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The technical progress of metabolomics-the analysis of metabolite composition of cells, tissues, and biofluids-and its ability to unravel phenotypical responses of organisms to their environment was accompanied by the democratization of their use in a wide range of scientific fields. While the reliability of analytical procedures was thoroughly assessed, the effects of preanalytical processing on sample metabolic profiles (i.e., conditioning, storage, transportation, etc.) remain quite unclear. This uncertainty is especially notable for samples collected in the frame of ecological studies, which often involve field sampling and remote sample production, leading to extended transportation durations and suboptimal storage conditions. In this study, we evaluated the impact of storage duration and temperature, along with the effects of freeze-drying (or lyophilization; the process of stabilization through dehydration by sublimation), on the metabolic profiles of samples relevant to ecological studies. Specifically, we focused on the lesser mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus), the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), and the perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). The levels of 60 different metabolites were quantitatively analyzed using targeted metabolomics through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). We report significant metabolic shifts associated with freeze-drying, resulting in both increases and decreases in the contents of more than half of the quantified metabolites across all assessed chemical families. Several amino acids exhibited more than a fourfold increase in all investigated matrices. Furthermore, while samples stored at -80°C exhibited profiles most similar to those of samples analyzed right after collection, the metabolic profiles of these samples gradually changed over the 6 months of storage. Interestingly, metabolic shifts related to sample preanalytical processing and storage were relatively consistent across the biological matrices studied, particularly between the two insect species. Based on these observations, we propose several recommendations for reliable preanalytical sample processing in ecological studies, considering logistical and economic constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.