ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Regional body composition and human core temperature responses to mild temperature water immersion in adults.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regional body composition and human core temperature responses to mild temperature water immersion in adults.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This project studied the effects of regional body composition on the core temperature responses to water immersion. Forty-six volunteers participated in the study, with subgroups of eighteen immersed from the neck down in 18, 22, and 26°C water for up to 10 h, respectively. Regional body composition was measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Rectal temperature (Tc), and 10-site mean skin temperatures (Tsk) were measured every minute. Immersion durations ranged from 0.83 to 10 h, and Tc ranged from 35.2 to 38.0°C at the end of immersion. Tc cooling rates were calculated over the first 0.83 h of immersion. Tc cooling rates varied widely, ranging from -0.37 to 0.93°C/h, -0.39 to 1.87°C/h, and -0.13 to 1.13°C/h at 18, 22 and 26°C water, respectively. The trunk fat mass was negatively and significantly correlated to Tc cooling rates (-0.58, -0.76, 0.60, -0.64, p ≤ 0.01) at 18, 22, 26°C water and across all temperatures combined. The arm fat mass, fat percentage and surface-to-mass ratio were negatively and significantly correlated with Tc cooling rates at most conditions, but not all. Individuals with high cooling rates (≥0.6°C/h) had on average half the trunk fat mass of those with low cooling rates (≤0.25°C/h), and those with low trunk fat mass are least capable of defending core body temperature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.