ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025
Developing and applying the 'Participatory Research to Action Framework' for meaningful engagement of experts-by-experience in applied health services research: a case study approach.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- "It gives me confidence and value": evaluating All_Ears@UoS patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) group three years on.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Making space to listen: engaging people with a chronic condition and various health literacy levels as citizen researchers.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of a Complex Implementation to Shape, Spread, Scale, and Sustain a New Dementia Care Resource for Better, More Integrated Care.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile many frameworks have been developed to guide participatory research, they are often tailored to a sector, health condition, research stage, or research design; making them highly specific and not easily transferable to other contexts. This paper reports on the iterative development of an overarching framework for participatory research, conducted within an applied health services research centre. The research centre needed a framework that was appropriate to a methodologically and substantively diverse program of research, involvement of a wide range of experts-by-experience, and that encompassed the full cycle of research including implementation and evaluation.
methodsDevelopment and application of the Participatory Research to Action Framework (PR2A) used a design science approach and is described through three sequential cases of participatory research that applied a range of methods, including: literature review, environmental scan, photo-journaling, co-design workshops, prototyping and process mapping. Reflections and learnings from each case influenced the subsequent cases.
resultsIn the first case, the research centre team encountered challenges when applying a service design approach to co-designing a cardiac care pathway. In the second case, the team used process mapping to develop a new framework, the Participatory Research to Action Framework (PR2A). The PR2A emphasizes creative approaches and embeds meaningful engagement of patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, health system leaders and others throughout six iterative stages: 1) Readiness; 2) Discover; 3) Define; 4) Develop; 5) Deliver; and 6) Measure. In the third case, the PR2A was successfully applied to create resources for caregivers and healthcare providers of people living with dementia.
conclusionsThe PR2A integrates key concepts from participatory methods used in health services research and service design to span the breadth of participants, methods, and research phases in community-based, action-oriented, applied health services research. It offers a holistic approach and strategies to ensure commitments to participation and to action are woven through every component of a research project.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.