Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366819›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

Developing and applying the 'Participatory Research to Action Framework' for meaningful engagement of experts-by-experience in applied health services research: a case study approach.

Justine L Giosa, Cara Evans, Valentina Cardozo, Paul Holyoke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justine L GiosaSE Research Centre, SE Health, 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 800, Markham, ON, L3R 6H3, Canada. justinegiosa@sehc.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-393X
Cara EvansSE Research Centre, SE Health, 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 800, Markham, ON, L3R 6H3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-4742
Valentina CardozoSE Research Centre, SE Health, 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 800, Markham, ON, L3R 6H3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-9133
Paul HolyokeSE Research Centre, SE Health, 90 Allstate Parkway, Suite 800, Markham, ON, L3R 6H3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4130-5383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile many frameworks have been developed to guide participatory research, they are often tailored to a sector, health condition, research stage, or research design; making them highly specific and not easily transferable to other contexts. This paper reports on the iterative development of an overarching framework for participatory research, conducted within an applied health services research centre. The research centre needed a framework that was appropriate to a methodologically and substantively diverse program of research, involvement of a wide range of experts-by-experience, and that encompassed the full cycle of research including implementation and evaluation.

methodsDevelopment and application of the Participatory Research to Action Framework (PR2A) used a design science approach and is described through three sequential cases of participatory research that applied a range of methods, including: literature review, environmental scan, photo-journaling, co-design workshops, prototyping and process mapping. Reflections and learnings from each case influenced the subsequent cases.

resultsIn the first case, the research centre team encountered challenges when applying a service design approach to co-designing a cardiac care pathway. In the second case, the team used process mapping to develop a new framework, the Participatory Research to Action Framework (PR2A). The PR2A emphasizes creative approaches and embeds meaningful engagement of patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, health system leaders and others throughout six iterative stages: 1) Readiness; 2) Discover; 3) Define; 4) Develop; 5) Deliver; and 6) Measure. In the third case, the PR2A was successfully applied to create resources for caregivers and healthcare providers of people living with dementia.

conclusionsThe PR2A integrates key concepts from participatory methods used in health services research and service design to span the breadth of participants, methods, and research phases in community-based, action-oriented, applied health services research. It offers a holistic approach and strategies to ensure commitments to participation and to action are woven through every component of a research project.

Indexed as

Co-designCommunity-based participatory researchExperience-based co-designHealth services researchIntegrated knowledge translationParticipatory researchParticipatory research methodsPatient engagementService design

Identifiers

PMID41366819
PMCPMC12802183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.