ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Multidimensional cell-free DNA fragmentomics enables early detection of breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentomics represents a transformative approach for early breast cancer detection, offering significant potential to improve patient survival through timely intervention. Despite this promise, existing cfDNA-based methods demonstrate inadequate sensitivity for clinical implementation, particularly in early-stage malignancies. There remains an urgent need to develop robust, cost-effective diagnostic strategies integrating cfDNA fragmentomic profiling with advanced machine learning algorithms.
methodsThis research involved a total of 191 participants who did not have cancer and 204 participants diagnosed with breast cancer. The plasma cfDNA samples from the participants underwent profiling through whole-genome sequencing. A variety of cfDNA characteristics and machine learning models were assessed within the training cohort to attain the best model. The evaluation of model performance took place in a separate validation cohort.
resultsAn assembled ensemble model that combines three cfDNA characteristics with six machine learning algorithms, developed in the training cohort (cancer: 119; healthy: 112), outperformed all models created from individual feature-algorithm pairs. This composite model demonstrated enhanced sensitivities of 93.3% at a specificity of 94.6% for the training cohort (area under the curve [AUC], 0.983) and 96.5% at 93.7% specificity for the validation cohort (AUC, 0.989) (cancer: 85; healthy: 79). Additionally, our model exhibited sensitivity across various stages, distinct pathological types, and diverse molecular classifications.
conclusionWe have established a stacked ensemble model using cfDNA fragmentomics features and achieved superior sensitivity for detecting early-stage breast cancer, which could promote early diagnosis and benefit more patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.