ArticleBMC public health2025
Mapping the path to diversity in clinical trials: a qualitative study of community member and stakeholder perspectives.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Chronic Stress and Trauma on Asthma Pathophysiology and Outcomes.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- An innovative and comprehensive approach to community health and research engagement using the Social Ecological Model.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient diversity in clinical trials has been a critical issue in the advancement of translational scientific research. There is a dire need for better representation of all populations to understand the efficacy of novel therapeutics and health interventions for promising outcomes. The current study aims to identify key factors that may lead to equitable participation in clinical research.
methodsThis qualitative study included focus groups with lower-income, racially or ethnically diverse community members (n = 51) and research stakeholders (n = 50) to identify factors that influence clinical trial participation. Focus groups were conducted between November 2023 and May 2024 within community-settings in Dallas, Texas. Directed Content Analysis using the Socioecological Model (SEM) as the theoretical framework was utilized for data analysis.
resultsKey barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies to clinical trial participation across four levels – individual, interpersonal, community, and macroeconomic/policy – were identified from the perspectives of community members and research stakeholders, separately. Prominent barriers included fear and mistrust at the individual level; misconceptions at the interpersonal level; historical experiences (defined as collective mistreatment faced by the participant’s community), lack of knowledge, and logistics at the community level; systemic mistrust as well as racism and consent/study language at the macroeconomic/policy level. Facilitators included personal health knowledge, monetary incentives, and safety at the individual level; trusted relationships and family health knowledge at the interpersonal level; altruism at the community level; transparency of safety/risk at the macroeconomic/policy level. Implementation strategies proposed were rebuilding trust, building relationships through community engagement, increasing awareness about clinical research, and leveraging culturally tailored resources to promote inclusiveness.
conclusionsUnderrepresentation of diverse populations in clinical studies warrants the need to consider multifaceted approaches to mitigate the current public health crisis. Ultimately, building trust, community engagement to promote knowledge and awareness, and transparency are essential for improving diversity in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.