Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366767›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Mapping the path to diversity in clinical trials: a qualitative study of community member and stakeholder perspectives.

Meera J Patel, Ketan Tamirisa, Emilie Ruiz, Zahria Griggs, Eunice Huan, Heather Kitzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meera J PatelPeter J. O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. meera.patel@utsouthwestern.edu.
Ketan TamirisaWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Emilie RuizPeter J. O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Zahria GriggsPeter J. O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Eunice HuanPeter J. O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Heather KitzmanPeter J. O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient diversity in clinical trials has been a critical issue in the advancement of translational scientific research. There is a dire need for better representation of all populations to understand the efficacy of novel therapeutics and health interventions for promising outcomes. The current study aims to identify key factors that may lead to equitable participation in clinical research.

methodsThis qualitative study included focus groups with lower-income, racially or ethnically diverse community members (n = 51) and research stakeholders (n = 50) to identify factors that influence clinical trial participation. Focus groups were conducted between November 2023 and May 2024 within community-settings in Dallas, Texas. Directed Content Analysis using the Socioecological Model (SEM) as the theoretical framework was utilized for data analysis.

resultsKey barriers, facilitators, and implementation strategies to clinical trial participation across four levels – individual, interpersonal, community, and macroeconomic/policy – were identified from the perspectives of community members and research stakeholders, separately. Prominent barriers included fear and mistrust at the individual level; misconceptions at the interpersonal level; historical experiences (defined as collective mistreatment faced by the participant’s community), lack of knowledge, and logistics at the community level; systemic mistrust as well as racism and consent/study language at the macroeconomic/policy level. Facilitators included personal health knowledge, monetary incentives, and safety at the individual level; trusted relationships and family health knowledge at the interpersonal level; altruism at the community level; transparency of safety/risk at the macroeconomic/policy level. Implementation strategies proposed were rebuilding trust, building relationships through community engagement, increasing awareness about clinical research, and leveraging culturally tailored resources to promote inclusiveness.

conclusionsUnderrepresentation of diverse populations in clinical studies warrants the need to consider multifaceted approaches to mitigate the current public health crisis. Ultimately, building trust, community engagement to promote knowledge and awareness, and transparency are essential for improving diversity in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCultural DiversityStakeholder ParticipationAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionQualitative ResearchTexasTrustClinical trialsCommunity membersParticipant diversityResearch stakeholdersUREG

Identifiers

PMID41366767
PMCPMC12690815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.