SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Can assessment of small airway dysfunction support the diagnosis or management of asthma exacerbations in children? A systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The silent zone of paediatric asthma: integrating small airway dysfunction assessment into clinical practice.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- From FEVJournal of asthma and allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma exacerbations are acute episodes associated with worsening symptoms and lung function decline. In children, diagnosis and monitoring rely largely on clinical judgment and measures of large airway function, which may overlook peripheral airway involvement. Tests of small airway function, such as forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25-75) and impulse oscillometry (IOS), may offer additional physiological insights. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence supporting the use of small airway tests during pediatric asthma exacerbations. MAIN BODY: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO, and this systematic review followed established methodology. Electronic databases searched included MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Library). The search strategy combined subject headings and keywords relating to asthma exacerbations and small airway function (e.g.,'asthma exacerbation', 'small airway dysfunction', 'impulse oscillometry'). Eligible studies included observational studies and randomised controlled trials assessing small airway tests during paediatric asthma exacerbations (aged <18 years). Risk of bias was assessed using appropriate validated tools according to study design. Thirty-five studies met inclusion criteria. Thirty-one studies reported FEF25-75; four studies reported IOS parameters, including one that also included multiple-breath washout (MBW). Most studies found that small airway indices were impaired during exacerbations and improved after treatment. In many cases, FEF25-75 and IOS parameters (R5-R20, AX) showed greater relative change than forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and small airways dysfunction persisted longer despite clinical recovery. All IOS studies achieved high feasibility in acute settings. No study evaluated whether small airway tests could be used to direct clinical management.
conclusionPhysiological tests of small airway function appear feasible during acute paediatric asthma exacerbations and may detect abnormalities not captured by FEV1. However, no included studies evaluated whether incorporating these indices altered management or improved outcomes. While these tests show promise for future diagnostic or monitoring use, further validation in larger cohorts is needed before routine implementation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2025 CRD42025623062. Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025623062 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.