Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366728›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

SimGBS: a rapid method for simulating large-scale genotyping-by-sequencing data.

Jie Kang, Melanie K Hess, Ken G Dodds, Rudiger Brauning, John C McEwan, Barry J Foote, Judy F Foote, Agnieszka Konkolewska, Shannon M Clarke, Andrew S Hess

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jie KangInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Mosgiel, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-5775
Melanie K HessInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Mosgiel, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-0036
Ken G DoddsInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Mosgiel, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-6379
Rudiger BrauningInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Mosgiel, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-9166
John C McEwanInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Mosgiel, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4801-6207
Barry J Foote, Hikurangi, New Zealand, 859 Russell Road, 0184.
Judy F Foote, Hikurangi, New Zealand, 859 Russell Road, 0184.
Agnieszka KonkolewskaCrops Research Centre, Teagasc, Oak Park, Carlow, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-9319
Shannon M ClarkeInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Mosgiel, New Zealand. Shannon.Clarke@agresearch.co.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4615-8917
Andrew S HessInvermay Agricultural Centre, AgResearch, Mosgiel, New Zealand. ahess@unr.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6738-3817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) offers a cost-effective solution to access genomic information on many samples. The advent of GBS has promoted large scale genomic analyses, including linkage analysis, heritability estimation, inference of genetic relatedness and genome-wide prediction and association studies, in many non-model species. Low-depth GBS can be used as a cost-effective method to obtain genotypes; however, not all alleles will be captured during the sequencing process, which can lead to high levels of genotype uncertainty. New methods that take genotype uncertainty into account are needed, but these methods can be difficult to develop and benchmark on real data. Simulations provide a convenient way to benchmark different approaches, and therefore, are essential for assessing existing methods and guiding future method development.

resultsSimGBS is a method for simulating large-scale GBS data from any real (e.g., reference) or simulated diploid genome. It is implemented in Julia but can also be accessed from R through the JuliaCall interface. Users can define populations with distinct demographic histories by modifying population size over a specified number of generations or providing a pedigree to generate structured populations. Most GBS parameters are highly customisable, including the choice of restriction enzyme and sequencing depth. SimGBS outputs both true genotype calls and DNA sequences in FASTQ format. The method is computationally efficient, capable of generating datasets for thousands of individuals; for example, simulating 172 samples required less than two hours while successfully reproducing the complexities observed in empirical GBS data.

conclusionSimGBS is a valuable tool to assist with designing GBS experiments or evaluating bioinformatic pipelines and statistical methods for GBS data analysis in large scale population genetics studies.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesAllelesAnimalsGenetic LinkageGenomicsGenotypeGoatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAAnimal genomicsGenotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)Plant genomicsRestriction enzymeSimulation

Identifiers

PMID41366728
PMCPMC12801997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.