ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
SimGBS: a rapid method for simulating large-scale genotyping-by-sequencing data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of KASP molecular markers and fingerprinting based on reduced representation genome sequencing of garlic.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) offers a cost-effective solution to access genomic information on many samples. The advent of GBS has promoted large scale genomic analyses, including linkage analysis, heritability estimation, inference of genetic relatedness and genome-wide prediction and association studies, in many non-model species. Low-depth GBS can be used as a cost-effective method to obtain genotypes; however, not all alleles will be captured during the sequencing process, which can lead to high levels of genotype uncertainty. New methods that take genotype uncertainty into account are needed, but these methods can be difficult to develop and benchmark on real data. Simulations provide a convenient way to benchmark different approaches, and therefore, are essential for assessing existing methods and guiding future method development.
resultsSimGBS is a method for simulating large-scale GBS data from any real (e.g., reference) or simulated diploid genome. It is implemented in Julia but can also be accessed from R through the JuliaCall interface. Users can define populations with distinct demographic histories by modifying population size over a specified number of generations or providing a pedigree to generate structured populations. Most GBS parameters are highly customisable, including the choice of restriction enzyme and sequencing depth. SimGBS outputs both true genotype calls and DNA sequences in FASTQ format. The method is computationally efficient, capable of generating datasets for thousands of individuals; for example, simulating 172 samples required less than two hours while successfully reproducing the complexities observed in empirical GBS data.
conclusionSimGBS is a valuable tool to assist with designing GBS experiments or evaluating bioinformatic pipelines and statistical methods for GBS data analysis in large scale population genetics studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.