Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366681›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

Narratives and behavioral perspectives: the overlooked role of infertility in reproductive health.

Jana Smith, Megan Christofield, Amarachi Ijeoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jana SmithIdeas42, 805 15th St NW Suite 1100, Washington, DC, 20005, US. jana@ideas42.org.
Megan ChristofieldJhpiego, 1615 Thames St #200, Baltimore, MD, 21231, US.
Amarachi IjeomaWilliam H. Gates Sr. Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, 615 N Wolfe St Suite W4041, Baltimore, MD, 21205, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Billions of dollars are spent on family planning in low- and middle-income countries each year. Despite this investment, about half of all pregnancies are still unintended. In recent years, there have been indications of progress against closing this gap, including meaningful commitments from country governments, increased investment in reproductive health supplies, and the development of new contraceptive technologies. There is, however, one issue that emerges in almost all research focused on women's needs and preferences related to reproductive health but has been woefully absent from the global agenda: infertility. Quality and accurate data are scarce, but studies suggest that one in six people is affected by infertility globally, with rates as high as 30-40% in parts of Sub-Saharan Africa. What if one of the most promising ways to meet family planning needs and goals was actually by addressing infertility? In a context of declining resources for reproductive health, adding infertility to the agenda may seem daunting. However, if we shift our health systems from treating infertility to preventing infertility we may be able to support more women in preventing and having pregnancies when they want them. Active investment and attention to infertility may also combat the efforts of anti-rights movements to link international actors with population control which can erode reproductive health gains. Challenging times call for unconventional thinking and addressing infertility may be the counterintuitive answer to making progress in family planning as well as more holistically answering the demands of women and families around the world.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesGlobal HealthInfertilityReproductive HealthFemaleHumansMalePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41366681
PMCPMC12690945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.