Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366669›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

Innovative dentifrices based on bioactive silica for enamel remineralization and erosion control: an in vitro study.

Elizabeth Barreto Galvão Sousa, Anderson Gomes Forte, Juliellen Luiz Cunha, Marcel Alves Avelino Paiva, Vitória Régia Rolim Nunes, Adriana Moreira Ferreira, Ana Maria Barros Chaves Pereira, Fábio Correia Sampaio, Andressa Feitosa Bezerra Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth Barreto Galvão SousaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil.
Anderson Gomes ForteGraduate Program in Dental Materials, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, Brazil.
Juliellen Luiz CunhaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil.
Marcel Alves Avelino PaivaGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil.
Vitória Régia Rolim NunesSchool of Dentistry, Institutional Scientific Initiation Scholarship Program, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil.
Adriana Moreira FerreiraSchool of Dentistry, Institutional Scientific Initiation Scholarship Program, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil.
Ana Maria Barros Chaves PereiraDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil.
Fábio Correia SampaioDepartment of Clinical and Social Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil.
Andressa Feitosa Bezerra OliveiraDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Brazil. andressa.feitosa@academico.ufpb.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental erosion and abrasion lead to progressive enamel loss, and preventive strategies often rely on fluoride dentifrices. Bioactive silica has emerged as a promising component due to its remineralizing potential, acting alone or synergistically with fluoride. This in vitro study evaluated the efficacy of bioactive silica dentifrices, with or without different fluoride concentrations, in promoting enamel remineralization and protecting against erosion‒abrasion cycles.

methodsSixty bovine enamel samples were assigned to five groups: RGS1 (bioactive silica dentifrice with 1450 ppm F), RGS2 (bioactive silica dentifrice with 1100 ppm F), RGS3 (bioactive silica dentifrice without fluoride), positive control (PC, 1100 ppm F dentifrice), and negative control (NC, fluoride- and silica-free dentifrice). The samples were subjected to a 5-day erosion-abrasion cycle with daily treatment with the assigned dentifrices. Enamel changes were assessed through surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR), fluorescence recovery (%ΔFR), surface loss (ΔSL), and surface roughness variation (ΔRa). The data were analyzed via one-way and repeated-measures ANOVA, followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).

resultsAll tested dentifrices significantly affected enamel properties. Compared with the controls, bioactive silica dentifrices improved the microhardness and promoted greater mineral gain (p < 0.05). RGS2 demonstrated the highest %SMHR and ΔFR values, along with lowest surface roughness and enamel loss, indicating superior protective potential. RGS1, RGS3 and PC followed, with intermediate outcomes. The NC group exhibited the poorest performance across all the parameters evaluated (p < 0.05).

conclusionBioactive silica dentifrices significantly enhance enamel remineralization and protection against erosion-abrasion. The results highlight both the synergistic and independent roles of bioactive silica, supporting its application in daily oral care strategies for managing enamel wear. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Dental EnamelDentifricesSilicon DioxideTooth ErosionTooth RemineralizationAnimalsCattleFluoridesHardnessIn Vitro TechniquesSurface PropertiesTooth AbrasionDentifricesFluoridesSilicon DioxideDental enamelFluorideSilicaTooth erosionToothpaste

Identifiers

PMID41366669
PMCPMC12802188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.