Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366668›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Nurse educators' experience of studying while working full-time at a public nursing education institution in South Africa: a focus group study.

Felicia Cecilia van Rooyen, Emmerentia du Plessis, Anneke Catherina van Graan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felicia Cecilia van RooyenNuMIQ Research Focus Area North-West University , 11 Hoffman Street, Potchefstroom, SA, South Africa. Felicia.VanRooyen@gauteng.gov.za.
Emmerentia du PlessisSchool of Nursing Science, NuMIQ Research Focus Area North-West University , 11 Hoffman Street, Potchefstroom, SA, South Africa.
Anneke Catherina van GraanSchool of Nursing Science, NuMIQ Research Focus Area North-West University , 11 Hoffman Street, Potchefstroom, SA, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe expectations that nurse educators should continue to engage in postgraduate studies remain high. This is also true in South Africa, where legislation namely the National Policy on Nursing Education and Training and the South African Nursing Council guidelines for programme implementation requires nurse educators to have research experience through their own research and/or studies toward higher education qualifications. This prompts nurse educators to pursue postgraduate studies to ensure that the public nursing education institution they are employed at obtains and/or maintains higher education status. This places pressure on nurse educators to study while working. Studying while working full-time puts strain on their coping mechanisms. Exploring and describing the experience of nurse educators of studying while working full-time is important so that insight can be gained into how to offer support.

methodsAn explorative and descriptive qualitative design was followed. Purposive sampling technique was used to select nurse educators who are studying while working full-time. Forty-three nurse educators participated in the study. Six unstructured focus group discussions were conducted at the six campuses of the public Nursing Education Institution in Gauteng, South Africa. Content analysis was done through the eight-step conventional qualitative content analysis method.

resultsEight main themes and two sub-themes emerged under two categories. Category 1 (negative aspects) included being required to participate in a "balancing act", high workloads and exhaustion, negative outcomes and impact, inadequate support systems and organizational problems in the educational system. The systemic problems included the role of nursing education institution policies and practices which hinder nurse educators' ability to study, particularly that of leave allocation, workload management and lack of support. It also included the influence of internal and external pressures on nurse educators' choice to study, looking at issues of autonomy and control. Category 2 (positive aspects) included opportunities created for development, improved confidence and competence, and building networks and relationships.

conclusionsThe focus of this study was to get a deeper understanding of the experiences of nurse educators who are studying while working full-time. The results create awareness of their experiences in developing structured support systems and in reviewing policies that will improve institutional processes. This study will significantly contribute to the body of knowledge regarding supporting nurse educators. Future research could focus on developing guidelines to support nurse educators who are studying while working full-time. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

ExperienceNurse educatorPublic nursing education institutionStudying while working

Identifiers

PMID41366668
PMCPMC12801582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.