ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Clearing the air: Which pollution source matters most for health?
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAir pollution remains a significant public health challenge, contributing to substantial morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to identify effective intervention strategies for mitigating air pollution and its health effects in southern Quebec.
methodsWe employ the Polair3D chemical transport model to estimate population-weighted concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM
resultsAll scenarios reduced air pollutant concentrations and associated mortality to varying degrees. The EPA and EV interventions are the most effective in reducing mortality, lowering deaths attributable to pollutants by 15.26% (789 deaths from 5169 to 4380) and 16.13% (834 deaths from 5169 to 4335), respectively. The EPA scenario yields the greatest reduction in PM
conclusionTargeted interventions can significantly reduce air pollution-related mortality. Replacing residential wood stoves and fully electrifying vehicles are particularly effective, with distinct benefits for PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.