SynthesisJournal of anesthesia2026
Anesthetic induction drugs during tracheal intubation in critically ill patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comments on 'Anesthetic induction drugs during tracheal intubation in critically ill patients: a systematic review' by Yatabe et al.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInduction of anesthesia in patients with unstable hemodynamics presents a major challenge for anesthesiologists; however, evidence to guide optimal practice remains limited. Although recent studies recommend etomidate and ketamine for tracheal intubation, etomidate may cause adverse effects such as adrenal insufficiency. Therefore, this systematic review evaluated the relationship between commonly used induction agents other than etomidate-including ketamine and midazolam-and the incidence of post-induction hypotension.
methodsWe systematically searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases from inception through March 16, 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation. We compared induction agents including ketamine, fentanyl, midazolam, remimazolam, propofol, thiopental, and placebo or saline. The primary outcome was post-induction hypotension.
resultsA total of 1,063 articles were identified during the initial screening, and nine met the inclusion criteria. Owing to marked heterogeneity in study design and drug comparisons, meta-analysis was not feasible. Reported incidence of post-induction hypotension varied widely (6-84%), reflecting differences in patient case mix, drug regimens, and definitions of hypotension. Definitions of hypotension and observation periods also differed across studies.
conclusionThis review found limited evidence on the hemodynamic effects of anesthetic agents other than etomidate during tracheal intubation in critically ill patients. Standardized definitions and high-quality research are needed to better characterize post-induction hypotension and determine the safest anesthetic combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41366602What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.