ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
Monocular advantage for multiple object tracking.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the allocation and deployment of attention in the human visual system for tracking multiple moving objects in dynamic scenes is critical for both theoretical advancements and practical applications. Previous research using various neuroimaging techniques has yielded conflicting views regarding the initial processing stage at which attentional modulation influences Multiple Object Tracking (MOT)-specifically, whether it initiates in early visual regions or at later processing stages. To address the question, we utilized a dichoptic MOT paradigm, where the retinal position of tracking targets between the eyes swapped while the visual perception remained consistent. Results showed that interocular target switching significantly decreased tracking accuracy, demonstrating a monocular advantage for MOT. This advantage was specifically attributed to the interocular switching of target information, rather than general interocular switching of any stimuli, sensory confounds, or differences in the proportion of binocularly imbalanced attentional distribution between the two eyes. These findings suggested that attentional modulation in MOT initiates at an early stage of visual processing, particularly at or before the primary visual area (V1), and may involve subcortical structures containing monocular neurons. Our findings enhanced understanding of the early mechanisms of attentional modulation in MOT and could have clinical implications, providing a novel quantitative method to evaluate the impact of interocular interaction deficits on sustained attention in conditions like strabismus and amblyopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41366591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.