ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Simultaneous Target-Mediated Drug Disposition-Pharmacodynamic (TMDD-PD) Modeling of Finasteride and Dutasteride: Impact of Target Binding and Turnover on Non-linear Pharmacokinetics.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) refers to non-linear pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles arising from the saturable interaction between a drug and its pharmacological target. Recently, our group revisited the TMDD cases observed in small-molecule drugs interacting with high-specificity targets, obtaining quantitative insights into in vivo target binding. In this study, we developed a physiologically-based PK (PBPK) model incorporating TMDD and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses (TMDD-PD) for finasteride and dutasteride, two time-dependent inhibitors of 5α-reductase (5αR). In addition to the tissue- and subtype-dependent 5αR inhibition, the model incorporated irreversible inactivation of 5αR and its turnover to account for the mechanism of time-dependent inhibition. We simultaneously analyzed the non-linear PK and PD (dihydrotestosterone level decline and recovery) data for both finasteride and dutasteride. Our model effectively captured the observed PK/PD profiles of both drugs, and the model-derived 5αR inhibition parameters were comparable to those obtained from in vitro 5αR inhibition data. Sensitivity analysis revealed that saturation of target binding is the primary driver of the non-linear PK and corresponding PD profiles, while slow turnover of 5αR contributes to the prolonged PD effect. Our results further suggest that the distinct PD profiles of finasteride and dutasteride are attributable to their differing inhibition characteristics against 5αR subtypes (selectivity and affinity). These findings extend our previous work and further support the utility of TMDD-PD modeling for optimizing clinical dose and improving therapeutic outcomes for small-molecule drugs exhibiting TMDD with time-dependent target inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41366580What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.