ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Adverse events and device malfunctions in da Vinci robotic surgery: an analysis of MAUDE data from the recent decade.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reported device problems and patient outcomes in da Vinci robotic robotic gastric and upper-gastrointestinal procedures: an FDA MAUDE database analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Adverse events and device malfunctions in robotic thyroidectomy: a decade-long analysis of the MAUDE database.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- da Vinci robotic-assisted surgery: implications for modern anesthetic practice.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of robotic surgery has expanded rapidly over the past decade. Although clinical outcomes of the widely adopted da Vinci surgical systems are well reported, large-scale evaluations of adverse events and device safety remain limited. The United States Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database provides a useful resource for characterizing malfunctions and safety outcomes across platforms. MAUDE reports involving da Vinci surgical systems from January 2015 to June 2025 were reviewed. Events were classified as malfunctions, injuries, or deaths, with malfunctions further characterized by type. Conversions and procedure abortions were identified and analyzed. The rates of adverse events were calculated and compared between robotic platforms. Among an estimated 15.9 million da Vinci robotic surgeries performed during the study period, 66,651 MAUDE reports were identified. There were 420.1 MAUDE reports, including 55.2 injuries, 3.1 deaths, 21.8 conversions, and 2.1 procedure abortion events, per 100,000 procedures. Compared with the da Vinci X/Xi, the da Vinci SP showed significantly higher risks of reported injury (RR 29.9, P < 0.001), death (RR 6.2, P < 0.001), conversion (RR 9.4, P < 0.001), and procedure abortion (RR 16.1, P < 0.001). Although adverse events and malfunctions associated with da Vinci robotic surgeries are relatively uncommon, the widespread use of these systems results in a substantial number of events. These findings highlight the need for prospective registry-based surveillance to validate platform-specific safety profiles as robotic surgery becomes increasingly integrated into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41366578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.