ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026
EVO-ICL Vault Prediction: A Data Wrangling Framework Integrating Multicenter Big Data and Machine Learning.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this work is to predict the implantable Collamer lens (ICL) vault using machine learning (ML) algorithms and a data wrangling approach based on multicenter big data.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study developed ML models using preoperative biometric data and ICL vault from 6715 eyes across five hospitals. Mutual information regression was employed to identify important parameters. A digital vault information system (DVIS) was constructed for data wrangling. ML models integrated with DVIS were used to develop ICL vault prediction and classification models, which were validated in both internal (6552 eyes) and external (163 eyes) validation.
resultsThe XGBoost model combined with DVIS exhibited statistically superior performance in ICL vault prediction, with lower mean absolute error (MAE) of 39.15 μm (internal validation) and 149.72 μm (external validation) compared to other ML algorithms. The R
conclusionsThe development of DVIS is valuable for ICL vault prediction models, as it provides a data wrangling strategy that improves ML efficiency. Experimental results confirm the applicability of this synergistic method in enhancing existing ML approaches for ICL vault prediction, thereby facilitating more informed clinical decision-making in ICL implantation surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.