Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Long-term results after modified Steel´s triple pelvic osteotomy.

Ondřej Schwarz, Jiří Chomiak, Pavel Dungl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ondřej SchwarzDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic. ondra.schwarz@seznam.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-6304
Jiří ChomiakDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel DunglDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term results of modified Steel's triple pelvic osteotomy were evaluated to confirm if this osteotomy is indicated in the era of other redirectional osteotomies and if it can delay total hip arthroplasty (THA). In total, 317 osteotomies were performed on 225 women and 58 men between 1985 and 2012 in one institution. Thirty-four women and three men underwent bilateral surgery. Harris hip scores (HHS) and nonarthritic hip scores (nAHS) and LCE angle, Sharp-Ulmann angle and signs of acetabular version were compared. The results were statistically evaluated using a paired t-test. In total, 55 women and 21 men were contacted. Of these, 35 women and 21 men completed the questionnaires for 68 hips. The follow up ranged from 5 to 32 years (mean 18.5 years). Of the 68 hip joints, 27 had excellent or good results according to HHS and 24 for nAHS. A total of 12 patients underwent THA. Concerning the radiological evaluation, the LCE angle increased from 12° to 34° and Sharp-Ulmann angle decreased from 49° to 36°. Signs of retroversion of the acetabulum occurred in 24 patients without of necessity of surgical treatment. Non-union (five patients) represents the most frequent complication. Steel's triple pelvic osteotomy is still indicated as a safe and effective technique for preserving hip joints and delaying THA. The disadvantage of osteotomy is a relatively long-term recovery time and lower satisfaction compared to THA.

Indexed as

OsteotomyPelvic BonesAdultAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip JointHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultHarris hip scoreLong-term resultsNonarthritic hip scoreTotal hip arthroplastyTriple pelvic osteotomy

Identifiers

PMID41366518
PMCPMC12800234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.