ArticleScientific reports2025
Long-term results after modified Steel´s triple pelvic osteotomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term results of modified Steel's triple pelvic osteotomy were evaluated to confirm if this osteotomy is indicated in the era of other redirectional osteotomies and if it can delay total hip arthroplasty (THA). In total, 317 osteotomies were performed on 225 women and 58 men between 1985 and 2012 in one institution. Thirty-four women and three men underwent bilateral surgery. Harris hip scores (HHS) and nonarthritic hip scores (nAHS) and LCE angle, Sharp-Ulmann angle and signs of acetabular version were compared. The results were statistically evaluated using a paired t-test. In total, 55 women and 21 men were contacted. Of these, 35 women and 21 men completed the questionnaires for 68 hips. The follow up ranged from 5 to 32 years (mean 18.5 years). Of the 68 hip joints, 27 had excellent or good results according to HHS and 24 for nAHS. A total of 12 patients underwent THA. Concerning the radiological evaluation, the LCE angle increased from 12° to 34° and Sharp-Ulmann angle decreased from 49° to 36°. Signs of retroversion of the acetabulum occurred in 24 patients without of necessity of surgical treatment. Non-union (five patients) represents the most frequent complication. Steel's triple pelvic osteotomy is still indicated as a safe and effective technique for preserving hip joints and delaying THA. The disadvantage of osteotomy is a relatively long-term recovery time and lower satisfaction compared to THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.