ArticleMovement ecology2025
Radio telemetry of butterflies: practical insights and critical tag-weight thresholds.
Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadio telemetry offers new opportunities for studying the movement of insects. One important prerequisite for using radio tags to study butterfly movement ecology is that tag weight and attachment do not significantly affect butterfly flight performance. Despite recent applications of telemetry in butterflies, a systematic evaluation of tag-to-body-weight thresholds for successful tagging has been lacking.
methodsWe tested ultra-light radio tags (0.13 g) on 117 individuals of 18 butterfly species under greenhouse and field conditions. Tag-to-body-weight ratios ranged from 5.6% to 77.8%. We used generalized linear mixed-effects models to identify predictors of flight success and used ROC analysis to determine the critical tag-to-body-weight threshold. Tag retention was also compared between thoracic and abdominal attachment sites.
resultsWe found that a threshold of approximately 20% of body weight marks a critical point beyond which flight performance declines significantly. Abdominal tag attachment proved more reliable and stable than thoracic attachment, with lower detachment rates.
conclusionsThis study presents the first comprehensive evaluation of tag-to-body-weight thresholds and attachment methods in butterfly telemetry. The results provide practical guidance for planning radio telemetry studies of butterflies and for conducting further methodological research, such as into the effects of tagging on butterfly behavior, body condition, survival, and reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.