Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366496›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2025

Who remains uncovered? Assessing inequalities and determinants of national health insurance enrolment among informal sector workers in Kenya.

Phidelis Nasimiyu Wamalwa, Christoph Strupat, Kavita Singh, MaryBennah N Kuloba, Jacob Kazungu, Manuela De Allegri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phidelis Nasimiyu WamalwaHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 6th Floor, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. phidelis.wamalwa@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7789-1292
Christoph StrupatGerman Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bonn, Germany.
Kavita SinghHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 6th Floor, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
MaryBennah N KulobaHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 6th Floor, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jacob KazunguHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Manuela De AllegriHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 6th Floor, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Foundation for the National Institutes of Health 1 K43 TW011164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany sub-Saharan African countries are increasingly adopting national health insurance policies to improve access to essential services. Informal sector workers, however, often lack coverage because their earnings are typically not low enough to qualify for government subsidies but insufficient to cover insurance premiums, resulting in a phenomenon known as "missing middle". This paper examined socioeconomic inequalities in national health insurance enrolment and determinants of participation among informal sector workers in Kenya.

methodsWe used nationally representative cross-sectional household survey data (n = 5168) collected from informal sector workers in Kenya in December 2020. First, we examined levels of national health insurance enrolment among informal sector workers. Second, we examined socioeconomic inequalities in national health insurance enrolment using concentration curves and the Wagstaff index. Third, we employed a three-level mixed effects logistic regression model to assess the determinants of national health insurance enrolment.

resultsOverall, 21.75% (95% Confidence Interval 20.63-22.89) of informal sector workers in Kenya were enrolled in the national health insurance scheme. We observed pro-rich inequalities in national health insurance enrolment, with a concentration index of 0.35 (95% CI 0.30-0.41). Older age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.66, 95% CI 1.31-2.10), employment in the non-agricultural sector (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.60-2.39), microfinance institutional membership (AOR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.23-1.69), higher education level (AOR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.99-3.11), household's prior positive experience with healthcare (AOR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.22-1.72), and higher socioeconomic status based on the wealth asset index (AOR = 3.87, 95% CI 2.97-5.05) were all significantly positively associated with national health insurance enrolment. Larger households had lower odds of enrollment (AOR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that enrollment rates among informal sector workers remain low, and important pro-rich inequalities prevail. Economic factors, education, and prior experience with healthcare services were key drivers of national health insurance enrollment. Further policies are needed to increase enrollment among informal sector workers, including differential premium levels, reliance on expanded targeted subsidies, and enhanced awareness campaigns. Our findings are also applicable to other low-resource settings experiencing conditions similar to those in Kenya as they transition toward national health insurance policies, with the goal of achieving universal health coverage.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesInformal SectorInsurance CoverageNational Health ProgramsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultEnrolmentInequalityInformal sectorKenyaMissing-middleNational health insuranceUniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID41366496
PMCPMC12687509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.