Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366485›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2025

Measuring health and well-being from preconception to early life in Indigenous populations: a scoping review protocol.

Erynne Sjoblom, Stephanie Montesanti, Barbara S E Verstraeten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erynne SjoblomCollaborative Applied Research for Equity in Health Policy and Systems (CARE) Research Lab, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-081 Dianne and Irving Kipnes Health Research Academy, 11405 - 87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada. jesjoblo@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-9330
Stephanie MontesantiCollaborative Applied Research for Equity in Health Policy and Systems (CARE) Research Lab, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-081 Dianne and Irving Kipnes Health Research Academy, 11405 - 87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Barbara S E VerstraetenCollaborative Applied Research for Equity in Health Policy and Systems (CARE) Research Lab, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-081 Dianne and Irving Kipnes Health Research Academy, 11405 - 87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous Peoples face a notable absence of standardized equity indicators for non-communicable diseases. Existing measurement models are rooted in Euro-Western biomedical frameworks that overlook Indigenous worldviews, definitions of health, and relational approaches to wellness. These models remain narrow in scope-focused on disease-specific indicators and treatment pathways-and reinforce deficit-oriented perspectives rather than advancing holistic, strengths-based understandings of well-being. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize research that utilizes, assesses, or validates measures of wellness, health, and supportive early environments in Indigenous populations.

methodsThis review will use an Indigenous-informed scoping review study methodology, which grounds each stage of the review process in Indigenous values and community guidance. A systematic search of global academic and grey literature databases will be conducted to identify relevant literature. Selected studies will include those that assess or validate the measurement of health and wellness spanning from preconception through pregnancy, infancy, and early childhood within Indigenous populations in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the USA. Articles will be screened and assessed for eligibility by two reviewers. From eligible articles, data including author and year of publication; source country; target population; objectives; name(s) of instrument(s); type(s) of measure(s); development/adaptation/validation process; main outcomes; community engagement; quality assessment; and other descriptive variables will be extracted. A thematic analysis approach guided by an Indigenous Community Advisory Committee will be applied to synthesize the findings. DISCUSSION: This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize the global literature on tools and instruments to measure health, well-being, and supportive early environments in Indigenous populations. This work aims to inform the development of Indigenous wellness indicators for the Indigenous Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (I-HeLTI) Cohort Research Study funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Traditional population health monitoring methods, rooted in Western paradigms, have often perpetuated colonial biases and overlook unique contexts of Indigenous communities. This review seeks to bridge knowledge gaps in developing and validating Indigenous wellness indicators that align with Indigenous values and aspirations. The findings are expected to advance ethical approaches to health measurement in Indigenous populations, supporting data sovereignty and culturally inclusive wellness indicators. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/yfv8m .

Indexed as

Health StatusIndigenous PeoplesPopulation GroupsAustraliaCanadaFemaleHealth Services, IndigenousHumansNew ZealandPregnancyResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicEarly child developmentHealth measurementHealthy life trajectoriesIndigenous populationsScoping review

Identifiers

PMID41366485
PMCPMC12801813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.