Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366484›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Teaching Mindfulness-Based Programs online: perceived costs and benefits.

Alison M Burton, Rebecca S Crane, Gemma M Griffith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alison M BurtonCentre for Mindfulness Research and Practice, School of Psychology and Sports Science, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK. sep844@bangor.ac.uk.
Rebecca S CraneCentre for Mindfulness Research and Practice, School of Psychology and Sports Science, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK.
Gemma M GriffithCentre for Mindfulness Research and Practice, School of Psychology and Sports Science, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examines the demographics of those who teach Mindfulness-Based Programs (MBPs) online, and their experiences of the online teaching process. Understanding these issues could inform strategies to widen access and enables understanding of the challenges and opportunities of teaching MBPs online versus in-person.

methodsData from 109 mindfulness MBP teachers were collected via a 50-question online survey, originating in the United Kingdom (UK). Responses were analysed using SPSS. Content Analysis was undertaken on the qualitative responses to identify key themes.

resultsTeachers articulated some challenges in teaching MBPs online such as embodying mindfulness and safeguarding participants. Teachers were mostly positive about online teaching for reasons such as wider accessibility. The survey also highlighted the lack of demographic diversity amongst the online mindfulness teaching community.

conclusionsThe field would benefit from further considering best practice concerning nuanced aspects of online MBP delivery, particularly around how embodiment is communicated and safeguarding participants. The challenges and opportunities identified in this study are likely to be applicable to other online learning and therapeutic environments. The apparent lack of diversity amongst MBP teachers could limit the potential for MBPs to impact broad sectors of societies, though it is unknown how representative the current sample is.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceInternetMindfulnessTeachingAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomMBI:TACMental healthMindfulnessMindfulness-Based Programs (MBPs)OnlineQualitativeTeachers

Identifiers

PMID41366484
PMCPMC12690780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.