ArticleBMC medical education2025
Development of a 3D transparent aortic model as a radiation-free training simulator for basic skills of endovascular aortic interventions.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndovascular aortic repair (EVAR) are gradually replacing open surgical repair for aortic diseases, due to their minimally invasive nature. These procedures require a high level of expertise that is gained through extensive clinical experience, posing risks such as prolonged radiation exposure. Training on 3D-printed simulation models can offer safer environment for learning & improve procedural precision & outcome.
methodA single-center study to evaluate whether training on radiation-free three-dimensional (3D) printed aortic training models can reduce the time required from vascular surgeons to complete the basic endovascular navigation tasks, such as navigating the guide wire & probing the different branches. We involved 15 vascular doctors, 8 in-experienced (group1) & 7-experienced (group2). Participants received a 15-min lecture on aortic interventions and guide wire handling. Two self-made 3D printed training models were used. Models either are of the entire aorta (ascending to iliacs, see model1) or thoracoabdominal aorta (model2) were used. A covering box and a camera positioned above the aortic model that mirror the intervention on a monitor, simulating the indirect vision of the intraoperative fluoroscopy. Participants were required to probe and intubate four aortic branches (two renal arteries, coeliac trunk, & superior mesenteric artery) in three steps: initial assessment, 15-min training, & post-training assessment (next day). Task completion times were recorded & analyzed.
resultsGroup1 initially required 914 ± 420 s to intubate four ostia, which significantly decreased to 149 ± 48 s post-training (p = 0.001). Experts showed no significant time reductions following the training (p = 0.443). Initial times were significantly lower for Group2 (p = 0.002), but post-training times showed no significant difference between both groups (p = 0.134).
conclusionUsing 3D-printed models in a simulation-training may help to familiarize & train participants with endovascular aortic procedures within limited material costs, leading to significant reductions in task completion time among trainees. Additionally, a significant reduction in simulated visualization time was observed, suggesting potential for reduced fluoroscopy exposure in real procedures.
trial registrationThe institutional ethics committee of the University Hospital of Mainz approved this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.