ArticleBMC medical education2025
Analysis of the effectiveness of SPOC combined with BOPPPS teaching method in stoma care training for nurses in neonatal intensive care units.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective training for nurses in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is crucial to alleviate suffering, prevent complications, and enhance the quality of life for infants with stomas. Although both Small Private Online Courses (SPOC) and the BOPPPS (Bridge-in, Objective, Pre-assessment, Participatory Learning, Post-assessment, Summary) method are established educational strategies based on strong, theoretical frameworks, their potential integration remains unexplored. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the combined SPOCs and BOPPPS approach in comparison to conventional methods for teaching stoma care to neonatal nurses.
methodsIn September 2023, a total of 44 nurses from the NICU were selected as participants in the study through convenience sampling. They were grouped by their year of joining the hospital: 16 nurses were in the control group (joined in 2019), and 28 nurses were in the experimental group (joined in 2020). The experimental group received training through a SPOC integrated with the BOPPPS teaching model, while the control group underwent traditional offline instruction. The results indicated significant differences between the two groups in terms of stoma-related theoretical knowledge, operational skills, and self-efficacy scores for stoma care management. This analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of the training.
resultsStatistically significant differences were observed in both theoretical knowledge (F = 32.537, P < 0.001) and practical skills test (F = 17.257, P < 0.001) across the groups. Furthermore, the self-efficacy scores for stoma care management in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (F = 21.706, P < 0.001).
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that the SPOC + BOPPPS model significantly enhances theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and self-efficacy in stoma care among NICU nurses compared to traditional methods. Although this was a single-center study with a limited sample size, the results provide preliminary evidence supporting the value of this integrated approach in training for neonatal stoma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.