Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366389›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Influence of a b-learning model to improve perceived stressors in final-year nursing students during clinical placements: a quasi-experimental study.

Silvia Reverté-Villarroya, Elsa Gil-Mateu, José Fernández-Sáez, Maria-Antonia Martorell-Poveda, Rosa Raventós-Torner, Josep Barceló-Prats

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silvia Reverté-Villarroya *Nursing Department, Campus Terres de l'Ebre, Universitat Rovira Virgili, Avenue Remolins, 13-15, Tarragona, 43500, Spain.
Elsa Gil-Mateu *Nursing Department, Campus Terres de l'Ebre, Universitat Rovira Virgili, Avenue Remolins, 13-15, Tarragona, 43500, Spain. elsa.gil@urv.cat.
José Fernández-Sáez *Nursing Department, Campus Terres de l'Ebre, Universitat Rovira Virgili, Avenue Remolins, 13-15, Tarragona, 43500, Spain.
Maria-Antonia Martorell-Poveda *Advanced Nursing Research Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 43002, Spain.
Rosa Raventós-Torner *Advanced Nursing Research Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 43002, Spain.
Josep Barceló-Prats *Advanced Nursing Research Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, 43002, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical placements are essential for nursing students’ competence development but represent one of the most stressful components of their training. High levels of perceived stress may hinder learning, undermine confidence, and negatively affect clinical performance. Evidence on pedagogical strategies to mitigate these stressors remains inconsistent, and the potential of blended-learning models during placements is not well established. This study evaluated the effect of a tutored blended-learning model (i-MHA) on perceived stressors among final-year nursing students.

methodsA prospective quasi-experimental pre–post study with a control group was conducted across three campuses of the Rovira i Virgili University (Spain) during the 2021–2022 academic year. The intervention group received a structured blended-learning model incorporating moderated online forums, guided reflection, and weekly tutor-led supervision. The control group followed the traditional supervision approach. Perceived stress was assessed before and after placements using the Kezkak questionnaire. Between-group differences were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test, and within-group changes using the Wilcoxon test. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) and attrition analyses were performed to validate internal consistency.

resultsA total of 126 students participated (86.89% women; mean age 23.64 years). No significant baseline differences were found between groups across any Kezkak dimensions. After the intervention, the only significant between-group difference emerged in Factor 3 (Relationship with tutors and peers), with lower stress scores in the intervention group (p = 0.030). In the paired intragroup analysis (n = 61), the intervention group showed a significant improvement in the same dimension (p = 0.032), while no significant changes were detected in the control group. No sex-related differences emerged, and baseline comparisons between paired and unpaired participants indicated no systematic attrition bias.

conclusionsThe tutored b-learning model improved students’ perceived relationship with tutors and peers during clinical placements, reducing stress associated with supervisory interactions. Although other stress dimensions did not change, the model strengthened communication and academic support, offering a promising strategy to enhance student well-being and learning during clinical practice. Further research with larger and diverse samples is warranted to explore its long-term impact on academic performance, psychological well-being, and transition to professional practice. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Blended-learningClinical skillsEducationNursingPsychologicalStressStudent nursing

Identifiers

PMID41366389
PMCPMC12801840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.