ArticleBMC health services research2025
A systematic model for health systems to prevent and respond to health emergencies in the workplace.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a research gap in explaining the health system’s role in responding to pandemics and other health emergencies within a systematic framework. This study aims to present a systematic model for health systems to respond to health emergencies in the workplace, drawing on national and international experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on Iran as a case study.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative, content analysis approach, utilizing a triangulation method to collect and analyze data. Data were gathered through document review and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using inductive and deductive content analysis techniques. The trustworthiness of the findings was assessed using five criteria, including credibility, transferability, dependability, confirmability, and stability.
resultsThe resulting systematic model consists of 45 subthemes, 22 themes, seven dimensions, and four domains. At the domain and subdomain levels, the health system should, during the planning phase, develop a documented plan that understands the context of workplaces in the health emergency and includes leadership commitment and workplace participation. During the operational phase, the health system should implement measures to control the emergency while providing necessary support. During the checking phase, the health system should evaluate performance in the context of the emergency. In the acting phase, the health system should continuously improve its response based on feedback.
conclusionHealth systems, along with other workplace stakeholders, play a critical role in a systematic feedback loop during health emergencies. The proposed model, customized for specific contexts, can serve as a framework for health systems to respond effectively to workplace health emergencies. Future research should focus on testing the model in diverse settings, with an emphasis on both qualitative and quantitative assessments of its effectiveness and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.