Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366378›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical education2025

Effect of endodontic case difficulty on endodontic mishaps and the number of treatment visits: a clinical study.

Arzu Kaya Mumcu, Mehmet Çorak, Safa Kurnaz, Gülsen Kiraz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06640790 (Effect of Endodontic Case Difficulty on Endodontic Mishaps), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06640790 completednot on this map

Effect of Endodontic Case Difficulty on Endodontic Mishaps: Clinical Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKutahya Health Sciences UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsEffect of Endodontic Case Difficulty on Endodontic Mishaps, Root Canal TreatmentArmsCase Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arzu Kaya MumcuDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, 43100, Turkey. arzu.kayamumcu@ksbu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7291-144X
Mehmet ÇorakDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, 43100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6516-1022
Safa KurnazDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, 43100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8079-7536
Gülsen KirazDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, 43100, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-7329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoot canal treatment, despite its high success rate, remains a challenging procedure due to anatomical complexities or procedural limitations, which may occasionally result in treatment failure. This study evaluated the influence of endodontic case difficulty, categorized by the American Association of Endodontists assessment form (low, moderate, high), on the incidence of endodontic mishaps and treatment visit requirements in postgraduate dental students.

methodsThis prospective clinical study analyzed 200 root canal treatments performed on 200 patients by a postgraduate dental student, classified according to the American Association of Endodontists Case Difficulty Assessment Form. Mishaps included over-instrumentation, working length loss, underfilling, overfilling, apical transportation, instrument fracture, and perforation. Statistical analyses, including independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Spearman's correlation, and Chi-square tests (p < 0.050), were performed to evaluate the relationships among case difficulty, occurrence of mishaps, tooth type, and the influence of case difficulty on the number of treatment visits.

resultsOf the cases, 48.5% were high difficulty, 31.5% moderate, and 20% low difficulty. Endodontic mishaps were significantly more frequent in molars compared to anterior and premolar teeth (p = 0.001). Case difficulty was significantly associated with mishaps such as underfilling, overfilling, and the need for additional visits (p < 0.050), while no significant relationship was observed for other mishap types (p > 0.050). Case difficulty showed significant positive correlations with both the number of mishaps (r = 0.344, p < 0.050) and the number of treatment visits (r = 0.433, p < 0.050).

conclusionThis prospective clinical study demonstrated that the majority of procedural mishaps occurred in molar teeth and in high-difficulty cases. The American Association of Endodontists Case Difficulty Assessment Form proved useful in anticipating potential risks. Incorporating such structured case assessment tools may help clinicians reduce mishaps and enhance the success of root canal treatments.

trial registrationThe study protocol was registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database with the identifier number NCT06640790 on 11 October 2024.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEndodonticsRoot Canal TherapyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStudents, DentalCase difficultyEndodontic mishapsPostgraduate dental educationRoot canal treatment

Identifiers

PMID41366378
PMCPMC12801980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.