Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366376›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

The effect of polishing pastes on the surface roughness, microhardness, gloss, and color change of resin composites.

Murat Büyükpolat, Numan Aydın, Bilge Eryılmaz, Serpil Karaoğlanoğlu, Bilge Ersöz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Murat BüyükpolatDepartment of Restorative Dental Treatment, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6814-5230
Numan AydınDepartment of Restorative Dental Treatment, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. numan.aydin@sbu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8628-4507
Bilge EryılmazDepartment of Restorative Dental Treatment, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8139-8979
Serpil KaraoğlanoğluDepartment of Restorative Dental Treatment, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0601-8028
Bilge ErsözDepartment of Restorative Dental Treatment, Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-0457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe use of polishing pastes in the final surface preparation of resin composite restorations has become increasingly common. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of polishing pastes containing abrasives of different particle sizes on the surface roughness, microhardness, gloss, and color change of resin composites. MATERIALS AND

methodsSpecimens (10 × 2 mm³) were prepared from nanofill, nanohybrid, and supra-nano resin composites. After finishing and polishing procedures, polishing pastes containing diamond particles of < 1 μm (Lucida, Diashine), 1 μm (DiaPolisher, GC), and 0.5 μm (Diamond Polish Mint, Ultradent) were applied. Baseline measurements of surface roughness, microhardness, gloss, and color were recorded. Following artificial aging (5000 cycles), changes in these parameters were evaluated. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05).

resultsAfter the finishing and polishing procedures, no statistically significant decrease in surface roughness was observed in the nanofill and supra-nano resin composites following paste application (p > 0.05), whereas a statistically significant reduction was found in the nanohybrid composite (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was detected among the polishing pastes containing abrasives of different particle sizes (p > 0.05). Following the finishing and polishing procedures, specimens treated with polishing pastes exhibited a statistically significant reduction in surface roughness (p < 0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed among the pastes containing abrasives of different particle sizes (p > 0.05). The application of polishing pastes did not affect the surface microhardness of the resin composites. After the finishing and polishing procedures, the use of polishing pastes did not influence the gloss of nanofill and supra-nano resin composites (p > 0.05), but resulted in a statistically significant increase in the gloss of nanohybrid composites (p < 0.001). Resin composites treated with polishing pastes after finishing and polishing exhibited significantly less color change (p < 0.001).

conclusionsWhile polishing pastes did not influence the microhardness of resin composites, they improved surface roughness, gloss, and color stability. No significant differences were found among the different polishing pastes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of polishing pastes following finishing and polishing procedures may positively influence the surface roughness, gloss, and color stability of resin composites, thereby enhancing the clinical success of restorations.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental MaterialsDental PolishingColorDiamondHardnessHumansMaterials TestingNanocompositesParticle SizePolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsSurface PropertiesTime FactorsComposite ResinsDental MaterialsDiamondPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsColor changeFinishing and polishingGlossResin compositeSurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID41366376
PMCPMC12801450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.