ArticleBMC surgery2025
Beyond the scar: a retrospective analysis of a rare subtype of abdominal wall endometriosis with muscle fascia invasion and its surgical implications.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is a rare form of extrapelvic endometriosis, often developing after cesarean section. While typically presenting as a painful mass near surgical scars, its diagnosis is frequently delayed. This study investigates the clinical features, muscle fascia involvement, and surgical outcomes in patients with AWE.
methodsA retrospective review was performed on 21 patients with histologically confirmed AWE treated surgically at a tertiary care center between January 2016 and December 2020. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, lesion characteristics, fascia involvement, surgical techniques, and recurrence rates were analyzed.
resultsAll patients had a prior cesarean section. The most common symptom was a cyclic painful mass (76.2%). Muscle fascia invasion was detected in 42.9% of cases. Polypropylene mesh repair was used in defects ≥ 3 cm. Only one recurrence (4.8%) was observed during a mean follow-up of 22 months. A strong correlation existed between physical and radiologic lesion size (r = 0.923), and between symptom duration and time since cesarean (r = 0.579).
conclusionAWE should be considered in women with abdominal wall masses and cesarean history. Wide excision is effective, and mesh repair offers reliable outcomes in fascia-invading cases. Early recognition and tailored surgical planning help minimize recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.