ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of crack repair percentage in self-healing concrete using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concrete is the most widely used construction material, yet it is highly susceptible to micro-crack formation, which can critically reduce its durability and structural performance. This challenge has drawn significant research interest toward the self-healing capability of concrete as a sustainable solution. However, the effectiveness of self-healing in concrete is still mainly evaluated through time-consuming and costly experimental procedures, with no universally accepted standard methods, limiting its practical implementation. To address this problem and harness the potential of artificial intelligence for modeling complex nonlinear behaviors, this study develops three hybrid predictive models: artificial neural network (ANN) optimized with genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm. Model performance was assessed using multiple statistical indices, and the results demonstrated that all three hybrid models outperformed the reference study by Zhuang et al., with the ANN-LM model yielding the highest prediction accuracy. The findings highlight that integrating optimization algorithms with ANN provides a robust and reliable framework for predicting the crack healing percentage in self-healing concrete, offering valuable insights for the design and improvement of durable and sustainable cement-based materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.