ArticleScientific reports2025
A kinematic-and-muscular modulation strategy for FES-assisted upper limb rehabilitation: a feasibility study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric analysis of research on spinal cord injury and functional electrical stimulation: trends and frontiers.Spinal cord · 2026Article
- A Compositional Calibration Framework for Multi-Channel Functional Electrical Stimulation Enabling Hand Gesture Generation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is widely adopted for patient rehabilitation since it provides electrical pulses and, consequently, muscle contractions. The aim of the study is to develop a novel closed-loop multichannel contralaterally controlled FES technique for upper limb rehabilitation. In the proposed approach (Kinematic-and-Muscular-based Modulation Strategy, KMMS), the stimulation is off-line modulated by the difference of the myoelectric activity of the same muscle between limbs with the addition of on-line feedback due to kinematic patterns. The reference signals for stimulation were extracted from a dataset of myoelectric and kinematic patterns acquired from the dominant upper limb of ten healthy participants. KMMS represents an improvement of a literature technique (Muscular-based Modulation Strategy, MMS) where the stimulation is off-line modulated exclusively by electromyographic patterns. KMMS and MMS performance were compared by applying them to eight muscles of the non-dominant upper limb of ten healthy participants during ADL execution. KMMS demonstrated an improved completion rate during drinking (from 70% to 89%, P = 0.0200), pouring (from 75% to 89%, P = 0.0435), eating (from 72% to 86%) and handling objects (from 80% to 93%, P = 0.0414).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.