Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41366264›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Decoding Natufian mortuary practices through the taphonomy of an experimental burial.

Nira Alperson-Afil, Rivka Rabinovich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nira Alperson-AfilInstitute of Archaeology, The Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel. nira.alperson-afil@biu.ac.il.
Rivka RabinovichNational Natural History Collections, Institute of Earth Sciences, Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intentional burial of the dead emerged around 120,000 years ago, but it was with the Levantine Natufian culture (ca. 15 ka BP) that we see stone-constructed graves in designated burial sites. The Natufian investment of effort and resources prompts an inquiry into the motivations for such elaborate burials. This paper addresses this by presenting an experimental burial of a wild boar in a Natufian-like grave. The experiment provides data on post-depositional processes characteristic of such graves and offers insights into the potential incentives for their construction. The experiment demonstrated that while a constructed grave offers protection, the decomposition, gravity, and larval activity induce various modifications to both the grave and its content, including changes in shape and size and stone and bone displacement. We conclude that Natufian mortuary practices reflect a deep understanding of postmortem changes, which drove them to construct graves primarily for the protection of their dead. The demanding challenges and time constraints of postmortem bodily modifications emphasized the need for a robust social network. Only through collective effort and shared ritual engagement could Natufians manage the complex treatment of their dead and their grave construction. These dynamic mortuary practices actively contributed to the formation and development of their social structures and networks.

Indexed as

BurialMortuary PracticeAnimalsArchaeologyPostmortem ChangesSus scrofaSwine

Identifiers

PMID41366264
PMCPMC12689602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.